Catalog No.	PA007164.r2b
Product Name	Anti-mouse PD-L1 Antibody (B7-H1, 10F.9G2.1) | PA007164.r2b
Supplier Name	Syd Labs, Inc.
Brand Name	Syd Labs
Synonyms	Programmed Death Ligand 1, B7-H1, CD274, 10F.9G2 antibody
Summary	The in vivo grade recombinant anti-mouse PD-L1 / B7-H1 monoclonal antibody (rat IgG2b kappa) was produced in mammalian cells.
Clone	10F.9G2.1, the same variable region and constant region sequences as the rat anti-mouse PD-L1 monoclonal antibody (clone: 10F.9G2)
Isotype	Mouse IgG1, kappa
Applications	immunohistochemistry (IHC), Flow Cytometry (FC), and various in vitro and in vivo functional assays.
Immunogen	The original rat hybridoma (clone: 10F.9G2) was generated by immunizing rats with the mouse PD-L1 cDNA and mouse PD-L1 CHO transfectants.
Form Of Antibody	0.2 μM filtered solution of 1x PBS.
Endotoxin	Less than 1 EU/mg of protein as determined by LAL method.
Purity	>95% by SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions.
Shipping	The in vivo grade recombinant anti-mouse PD L1/B7-H1 monoclonal antibodies are shipped with ice pack. Upon receipt, store it immediately at the temperature recommended below.
Stability & Storage	Use a manual defrost freezer and avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. 1 month from date of receipt, 2 to 8°C as supplied. 3 months from date of receipt, -20°C to -70°C as supplied.
Note	Recombinant anti-mouse PD L1/B7-H1 monoclonal antibodies, which share the same variable region sequences with the rat anti-mouse PD L1 monoclonal antibody (clone number: 10F.9G2), are produced from mammalian cells and good for in vitro and in vivo studies.
Order Offline	Phone: 1-617-401-8149 Fax: 1-617-606-5022 Email: message@sydlabs.com Or leave a message with a formal purchase order (PO) Or credit card.

Description

PA007164.r2b: Recombinant Anti-mouse PD-L1 Antibody (Clone: 10F.9G2.1), Mouse IgG1, kappa, In Vivo Grade

The rat anti-mouse PD-L1 monoclonal antibody 10F.9G2 (rat IgG2b kappa) reacts with the mouse PD-L1 protein (programmed death ligand-1, B7-H1 or CD274 antibody), a member of the B7 family of the Ig superfamily. PD-1 has two ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2. It has been shown that in mouse models of melanoma, tumor growth can be transiently arrested via treatment with the anti-mouse PD-1 and anti-mouse PD-L1 antibodies which block the interaction between the PD-L1 protein and its receptor PD-1 protein. The 10F.9G2 monoclonal antibody blocks the binding of the mouse PD-L1 protein to the mouse PD-1 protein.

Our recombinant 10F.9G2 antibodies have a part (variable regions) or complete amino acid sequences of the rat anti-mouse PD L1 monoclonal antibody (hybridoma clone name or number: 10F.9G2).

References for Anti-mouse PD-L1 Antibody(10F.9G2.1):

1、Spatiotemporal depletion of tumor-associated immune checkpoint PD-L1 with near-infrared photoimmunotherapy promotes antitumor immunity
Shunichi Taki,et al.J Immunother Cancer. 2021.PMCID: PMC8559243
“Background
Near-infrared photoimmunotherapy (NIR-PIT) is a new modality for treating cancer, which uses antibody-photoabsorber (IRDye700DX) conjugates that specifically bind to target tumor cells. This conjugate is then photoactivated by NIR light, inducing rapid necrotic cell death. NIR-PIT needs a highly expressed targeting antigen on the cells because of its reliance on anti-mouse PD-L1 antibodies. However, using antibodies limits this useful technology to only those patients whose tumors express high levels of a specific antigen. Thus, to propose an alternative strategy, we modified this phototechnology to augment the anticancer immune system by targeting the almost low-expressed immune checkpoint molecules on tumor cells.
Methods
We used programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), an immune checkpoint molecule, as the target for NIR-PIT. Although the expression of PD-L1 on tumor cells is usually low, PD-L1 is almost expressed on tumor cells. Intratumoral depletion with PD-L1-targeted NIR-PIT was tested in mouse syngeneic tumor models.”

2、Human and mouse PD-L1: similar molecular structure, but different druggability profiles
Katarzyna Magiera-Mularz,et al.iScience. 2020.PMCID: PMC7788105
“In the development of PD-L1-blocking therapeutics, it is essential to transfer initial in vitro findings into proper in vivo animal models. Classical immunocompetent mice are attractive due to high accessibility and low experimental costs. However, it is unknown whether inter-species differences in PD-L1 sequence and structure would allow for human-mouse cross applications. Here, we disclose the first structure of the mouse (m) PD-L1 and analyze its similarity to the human (h) PD-L1. We show that anti-mouse pd-l1 antibody interacts with hPD-1 and provides a negative signal toward activated Jurkat T cells. We also show major differences in druggability between the hPD-L1 and mPD-L1 using therapeutic antibodies, a macrocyclic peptide, and small molecules. Our study indicates that while the amino acid sequence is well conserved between the hPD-L1 and mPD-L1 and overall structures are almost identical, crucial differences determine the interaction with anti-PD-L1 agents, that cannot be easily predicted in silico.”

3、89Zr-Labeled Anti-PD-L1 Antibody Fragment for Evaluating In Vivo PD-L1 Levels in Melanoma Mouse Model
Caleb Bridgwater,et al.Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2020.PMCID: PMC7578182
“The rise of programmed death-1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy has been one of the most promising developments in melanoma research. However, not all the melanoma patients respond to such immune checkpoint blockade. There is a great need of biomarkers for appropriate melanoma patient selection and therapeutic efficacy monitoring. The objective of this study is to develop a novel radiolabeled anti- mouse PD L1 antibody fragment, as an imaging biomarker, for evaluating the in vivo PD-L1 levels in melanoma. The Df-conjugated F(ab’)2 fragment of the anti-mouse PD-L1 antibody was successfully synthesized and radiolabeled with 89Zr. Both Df-F(ab’)2 and 89Zr-Df-F(ab’)2 maintained the nano-molar murine PD-L1 anti-mouse PD-L1targeting specificity and affinity. 89Zr-Df-F(ab’)2 showed less uptake in normal liver tissue in mice compared with its full antibody counterpart 89Zr-Df-anti-PD-L1. Positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography images clearly showed that 89Zr-Df-F(ab’)2 possessed superior pharmacokinetics and imaging contrast over the radiolabeled full antibody, with much earlier and higher tumor uptake (5.5 times more at 2 h post injection) and much lower liver background (51% reduction at 2 h post injection). The specific and high murine PD-L1-targeting uptake at tumor foci coupled with fast clearance of 89Zr-Df-F(ab’)2 highlighted its potential for in vivo PET imaging of murine PD-L1 levels and future development of radiolabeled anti-human PD-L1 fragment for potential application in melanoma patients.”

4、PD-L1-CD80 interactions are required for intracellular signaling necessary for dendritic cell migration
Uma Kantheti,et al.Sci Adv. 2025.PMCID: PMC11777207
“Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) interactions are targets for immunotherapies aimed to reinvigorate T cell function. Recently, it was documented that PD-L1 regulates dendritic cell (DC) migration through intracellular signaling events. In this study, we find that both preclinical murine and clinically available human PD-L1 antibodies limit DC migration. We show that cis interactions between PD-L1 and CD80 are critical for promoting migration and define specific regions within these proteins necessary for migration. Furthermore, we demonstrate that αPD-L1 significantly impedes DC migration in a B16 melanoma tumor model. Last, we outline how blocking cis PD-L1:CD80 interactions or mutation of the intracellular domain of PD-L1, in an imiquimod-induced murine model of psoriasis, limits DC migration to the lymph node, decreases interleukin-17 production by CD4+ T cells in the lymph node, and reduces epidermal thickening. Therefore, PD-L1 and CD80 interactions are important regulators of DC migration to the draining lymph node.”

5、Suppression of Exosomal PD-L1 Induces Systemic Anti-tumor Immunity and Memory
Mauro Poggio,et al.Cell. 2019.PMCID: PMC6499401
“PD-L1 on the surface of tumor cells binds its receptor PD-1 on effector T cells, thereby suppressing their activity. Antibody blockade of PD-L1 can activate an anti-tumor immune response leading to durable remissions in a subset of cancer patients. Here, we describe an alternative mechanism of PD-L1 activity involving its secretion in tumor-derived exosomes. Removal of exosomal PD-L1 inhibits tumor growth, even in models resistant to anti-PD-L1 antibodies. Exosomal PD-L1 from the tumor suppresses T cell activation in the draining lymph node. Systemically introduced exosomal PD-L1 rescues growth of tumors unable to secrete their own. Exposure to exosomal PD-L1-deficient tumor cells suppresses growth of wild-type tumor cells injected at a distant site, simultaneously or months later. Anti-PD-L1 antibodies work additively, not redundantly, with exosomal PD-L1 blockade to suppress tumor growth. Together, these findings show that exosomal PD-L1 represents an unexplored therapeutic target, which could overcome resistance to current antibody approaches.”

6、NDRG2 Expression in Breast Cancer Cells Downregulates PD-L1 Expression and Restores T Cell Proliferation in Tumor-Coculture
Aram Lee,et al.Cancers (Basel). 2021.PMCID: PMC8656534
“Simple Summary
N-myc downstream-regulated gene 2 (NDRG2) is a candidate tumor suppressor in various cancers, including breast cancer. Increased expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is frequently observed in human cancers. Despite its role in cancer cells, the effects of NDRG2 on PD-L1 expression and PD-L1-PD-1 pathway disruption have not been investigated. We demonstrated that NDRG2 overexpression inhibits PD-L1 expression in human breast cancer cells. Blocking T cell proliferation by coculture with 4T1 mouse tumor cells that express high levels of anti-mouse PD-L1 antibodies could be significantly reversed by NDRG2 overexpression in the same tumor cells. NDRG2 knockdown in NDRG2-transfected cells elicited the upregulation of PD-L1 expression and accelerated the inhibition of T cell proliferation. These findings were confirmed from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data that PD-L1 expression in basal and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients, but not in luminal A or B cancer patients, was negatively correlated with the NDRG2 expression.
Abstract
(1) Background: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of NDRG2 expression in regulating PD-L1 or PD-L2 on malignant breast cancer cells. (2) Methods: Overexpression and knockdown of the NDRG2 gene in human and mouse cancer cells were applied and quantitative real-time PCR and Western blot analysis were performed. T cell proliferation and TCGA analysis were conducted to validate negative correlation of the PD-L1 expression with the NDRG2 expression. (3) Results: We found that NDRG2 overexpression inhibits PD-L1 expression in human breast cancer cells through NF-κB signaling. NDRG2 overexpression in 4T1 mouse breast cancer cells followed by PD-L1 downregulation could block the suppressive activity of cancer cells on T cell proliferation and knockdown of NDRG2 expression enhanced the expression of anti-mouse PD-L1 antibody(10F.9G2), leading to the inhibition of T cell proliferation by tumor cell coculture. Finally, we confirmed from TCGA data that PD-L1 expression in basal and triple-negative breast cancer patients was negatively correlated with the expression of NDRG2. Intriguingly, linear regression analysis using TNBC cell lines showed that the PD-L1 level was negatively associated with the NDRG2 expression level. (4) Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that NDRG2 expression is instrumental in suppressing PD-L1 expression and restoring PD-L1-inhibited T cell proliferation activity in TNBC cells.”

7、Loss of VGLL4 suppresses tumor PD‐L1 expression and immune evasion
Ailing Wu,et al.EMBO J. 2018.PMCID: PMC6589543
“Targeting immune checkpoints, such as PD‐L1 and its receptor PD‐1, has opened a new avenue for treating cancers. Understanding the regulatory mechanism of PD‐L1 and PD‐1 will improve the clinical response rate and efficacy of PD‐1/PD‐L1 antibody blockade in cancer patients and the development of combinatorial strategies. VGLL4 inhibits YAP‐induced cell proliferation and tumorigenesis through competition with YAP for binding to TEADs. However, whether VGLL4 has a role in anti‐tumor immunity is largely unknown. Here, we found that disruption of Vgll4 results in potent T cell‐mediated tumor regression in murine syngeneic models. VGLL4 deficiency reduces anti-mouse PD L1 antibody(10F.9G2) expression in tumor cells. VGLL4 interacts with IRF2BP2 and promotes its protein stability through inhibiting proteasome‐mediated protein degradation. Loss of IRF2BP2 results in persistent binding of IRF2, a transcriptional repressor, to PD‐L1 promoter. In addition, YAP inhibits IFNγ‐inducible PD‐L1 expression partially through suppressing the expression of VGLL4 and IRF1 by YAP target gene miR‐130a. Our study identifies VGLL4 as an important regulator of PD‐L1 expression and highlights a central role of VGLL4 and YAP in the regulation of tumor immunity.”

8、Temporally-Distinct PD-L1 Expression by Tumor and Host Cells Contributes to Immune Escape
Takuro Noguchi,et al.Cancer Immunol Res. 2018.PMCID: PMC5510474
“Antibody blockade of Programmed Death-1 (PD-1) or its ligand, PD-L1, has led to unprecedented therapeutic responses in certain tumor-bearing individuals, but PD-L1 expression’s prognostic value in stratifying cancer patients for such treatment remains unclear. Reports conflict on the significance of correlations between PD-L1 on tumor cells and positive clinical outcomes to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. We investigated this issue using genomically-related, clonal subsets from the same methylcholanthrene-induced sarcoma: a highly immunogenic subset that is spontaneously eliminated in vivo by adaptive immunity and a less immunogenic subset that forms tumors in immunocompetent mice, but is sensitive to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy. Using CRISPR/Cas9-induced loss-of-function approaches and overexpression gain-of-function techniques, we confirmed that PD-L1 antibody on tumor cells is key to promoting tumor escape. Additionally, the capacity of PD-L1 to suppresses antitumor responses was inversely proportional to tumor cell antigenicity. PD-L1 antibody(10F.9G2) expression on host cells, particularly tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), was also important for tumor immune escape. We demonstrated that induction of PD-L1 on tumor cells was interferon gamma (IFNγ)-dependent and transient, but PD-L1 induction on TAMs was of greater magnitude, only partially IFNγ dependent, and was stable over time. Thus, PD-L1 expression on either tumor cells or host immune cells could lead to tumor escape from immune control, indicating that total PD-L1 expression in the immediate tumor microenvironment may represent a more accurate biomarker for predicting response to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy, compared to monitoring PD-L1 expression on tumor cells alone.”

9、Suppression of PD‐L1 release from small extracellular vesicles promotes systemic anti‐tumor immunity by targeting ORAI1 calcium channels
Xi Chen,et al.J Extracell Vesicles. 2022.PMCID: PMC9732629
“Blockade of immune checkpoints as a strategy of cancer cells to overcome the immune response has received ample attention in cancer research recently. In particular, expression of PD‐L1 by various cancer cells has become a paradigm in this respect. Delivery of anti mouse PD‐L1 antibody(10f 9g2 antibody) to its site of action occurs either by local diffusion, or else by transport via small extracellular vesicles (sEVs, commonly referred to as exosomes). Many steps of sEVs formation, their packaging with anti-mouse PD‐L1 antibody(10F.9G2) and their release into the extracellular space have been studied in detail. The likely dependence of release on Ca2+‐signaling, however, has received little attention. This is surprising, since the intracellular Ca2+‐concentration is known as a prominent regulator of many secretory processes. Here, we report on the roles of three Ca2+‐dependent proteins in regulating release of PD‐L1‐containing sEVs, as well as on the growth of tumors in mouse models. We show that sEVs release in cancer cell lines is Ca2+‐dependent and the knockdown of the gene coding the Ca2+‐channel protein ORAI1 reduces Ca2+‐signals and release of sEVs. Consequently, the T cell response is reinvigorated and tumor progression in mouse models is retarded. Furthermore, analysis of protein expression patterns in samples from human cancer tissue shows that the ORAI1 gene is significantly upregulated. Such upregulation is identified as an unfavorable prognostic factor for survival of patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer. We show that reduced Ca2+‐signaling after knockdown of ORAI1 gene also compromises the activity of melanophilin and Synaptotagmin‐like protein 2, two proteins, which are important for correct localization of secretory organelles within cancer cells and their transport to sites of exocytosis. Thus, the Ca2+‐channel ORAI1 and Ca2+‐dependent proteins of the secretion pathway emerge as important targets for understanding and manipulating immune checkpoint blockade by PD‐L1.”

10、Discovery of low-molecular weight anti-PD-L1 peptides for cancer immunotherapy
Hao Liu,et al.J Immunother Cancer. 2019.PMCID: PMC6805442
“Background
Immunotherapy using checkpoint inhibitors, especially anti mouse PD-1/PD-L1 antibody(10f 9g2) inhibitors, has now evolved into the most promising therapy for cancer patients. However, most of these inhibitors are monoclonal antibodies, and their large size may limit their tumor penetration, leading to suboptimal efficacy. As a result, there has been a growing interest in developing low-molecular-weight checkpoint inhibitors.
Methods
We developed a novel biopanning strategy to discover small peptide-based anti-PD-L1 inhibitors. The affinity and specificity of the peptides to PD-L1 were examined using various assays. Three-dimensional (3D) spheroid penetration study was performed to determine the tumor penetration capability of the peptides. Anti-tumor activity of the peptides was evaluated in mice bearing CT26 tumor cells.”

11、Regulation of sister chromatid cohesion by nuclear PD-L1
Jia Yu,et al.Cell Res. 2020.PMCID: PMC7343880
“Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1 or B7-H1) is well known for its role in immune checkpoint regulation, but its function inside the tumor cells has rarely been explored. Here we report that nuclear PD-L1 is important for cancer cell sister chromatid cohesion. We found that depletion of PD-L1 suppresses cancer cell proliferation, colony formation in vitro, and tumor growth in vivo in immune-deficient NSG mice independent of its role in immune checkpoint. Specifically, PD-L1 functions as a subunit of the cohesin complex, and its deficiency leads to formation of multinucleated cells and causes a defect in sister chromatid cohesion. Mechanistically, PD-L1 compensates for the loss of Sororin, whose expression is suppressed in cancer cells overexpressing PD-L1. PD-L1 competes with Wing Apart-Like (WAPL) for binding to PDS5B, and secures proper sister chromatid cohesion and segregation. Our findings suggest an important role for nuclear PD-L1 in cancer cells independent of its function in immune checkpoint.”

12、Small-molecule PIK-93 modulates the tumor microenvironment to improve immune checkpoint blockade response
Chia-Yi Lin,et al.Sci Adv. 2023.PMCID: PMC10081850
“Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting PD-L1 immunotherapy are state-of-the-art treatments for advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the treatment response of certain patients with NSCLC is unsatisfactory because of an unfavorable tumor microenvironment (TME) and poor permeability of antibody-based ICIs. In this study, we aimed to discover small-molecule drugs that can modulate the TME to enhance ICI treatment efficacy in NSCLC in vitro and in vivo. We identified a PD-L1 protein-modulating small molecule, PIK-93, using a cell-based global protein stability (GPS) screening system. PIK-93 mediated PD-L1 ubiquitination by enhancing the PD-L1–Cullin-4A interaction. PIK-93 reduced PD-L1 levels on M1 macrophages and enhanced M1 antitumor cytotoxicity. Combined PIK-93 and anti–PD-L1 antibody treatment enhanced T cell activation, inhibited tumor growth, and increased tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) recruitment in syngeneic and human peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) line–derived xenograft mouse models. PIK-93 facilitates a treatment-favorable TME when combined with anti–PD-L1 antibodies, thereby enhancing PD-1/PD-L1 blockade cancer immunotherapy.”

13、Preclinical immunoPET/CT imaging using Zr-89-labeled anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody for assessing radiation-induced PD-L1 upregulation in head and neck cancer and melanoma
Masahiro Kikuchi ,et al.Oncoimmunology. 2017.PMCID: PMC5543907
“Radiation therapy (RT) can induce upregulation of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) on tumor cells or myeloid cells, which may affect response to PD-1-based immunotherapy. PD-L1 upregulation during RT is a dynamic process that has been difficult to monitor during treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the RT-induced PD-L1 upregulation in the tumor and its microenvironment using immunoPET/CT imaging of two syngeneic murine tumor models (HPV+ head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) or B16F10 melanoma). Tumors were established in two locations per mouse (neck and flank), and fractionated RT (2 Gy × 4 or 2 Gy × 10) was delivered only to the neck tumor, alone or during anti-PD-1 mAb immunotherapy. PD-L1 expression was measured by PET/CT imaging using Zr-89 labeled anti-mouse PD-L1 mAb, and results were validated by flow cytometry. PET/CT imaging demonstrated significantly increased tracer uptake in irradiated neck tumors compared with non-irradiated flank tumors. Ex vivo analysis by biodistribution and flow cytometry validated PD-L1 upregulation specifically in irradiated tumors. In the HNSCC model, RT-induced PD-L1 upregulation was only observed after 2 Gy × 10 fractionated RT, while in the B16F10 model upregulation of PD-L1 occurred after 2 Gy × 4 fractionated RT. Fractionated RT, but not anti-PD-1 therapy, upregulated PD-L1 expression on tumor and infiltrating inflammatory cells in murine models, which could be non-invasively monitored by immunoPET/CT imaging using Zr-89 labeled anti-mouse PD-L1 mAb, and differentially identified anti-PD-1 responsive as well as selectively irradiated tumors in vivo.”

14、Novel Human Anti-PD-L1 mAbs Inhibit Immune-Independent Tumor Cell Growth and PD-L1 Associated Intracellular Signalling
Margherita Passariello,et al.Sci Rep. 2019.PMCID: PMC6739323
“The novel antibody-based immunotherapy in oncology exploits the activation of immune system mediated by immunomodulatory antibodies specific for immune checkpoints. Among them, the programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) is of particular interest as it is expressed not only on T-cells, but also on other immune cells and on a large variety of cancer cells, such as breast cancer cells, considering its high expression in both ErbB2-positive and Triple Negative Breast Cancers. We demonstrate here that PD-L1_1, a novel anti-PD-L1 T -cell stimulating antibody, inhibits PD-L1-tumor cell growth also by affecting the intracellular MAPK pathway and by activating caspase 3. Similar in vitro results were obtained for the first time here also with the clinically validated anti-PD-L1 mAb Atezolizumab and in vivo with another validated anti-mouse anti-PD-L1 mAb. Moreover, we found that two high affinity variants of PD-L1_1 inhibited tumor cell viability more efficiently than the parental PD-L1_1 by affecting the same MAPK pathways with a more potent effect. Altogether, these results shed light on the role of PD-L1 in cancer cells and suggest that PD-L1_1 and its high affinity variants could become powerful antitumor weapons to be used alone or in combination with other drugs such as the anti-ErbB2 cAb already successfully tested in in vitro combinatorial treatments.”

15、PKCα inhibitors promote breast cancer immune evasion by maintaining PD-L1 stability
Jiaojiao Yu,et al.Acta Pharm Sin B. 2024.PMCID: PMC11544271
“Protein kinase C α (PKCα) regulates diverse biological functions of cancer cells and is a promising therapeutic target. However, clinical trials of PKC-targeted therapies have not yielded satisfactory results. Recent studies have also indicated a tumor-suppressive role of PKCs via unclear molecular mechanisms. In this study, we found that PKCα inhibition enhances CD8+ T-cell-mediated tumor evasion and abolishes antitumor activity in immunocompetent mice. We further identified PKCα as a critical regulator of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and found that it enhances T-cell-dependent antitumor immunity in breast cancer by interacting with PD-L1 and suppressing PD-L1 expression. We demonstrated that PKCα-mediated PD-L1 phosphorylation promotes PD-L1 degradation through β transducin repeat-containing protein. Notably, the efficacy of PKCα inhibitors was intensified by synergizing with anti-PD-L1 mAb therapy to boost antitumor T-cell immunity in vivo. Clinical analysis revealed that PKCα expression is positively correlated with T-cell function and the interferon-gamma signature in patients with breast cancer. This study demonstrated the antitumor capability of PKCα, identified potential therapeutic strategies to avoid tumor evasion via PKC-targeted therapies, and provided a proof of concept for targeting PKCα in combination with anti-PD-L1 mAb therapy as a potential therapeutic approach against breast cancer, especially TNBC.”

16、Role of Forkhead Box P3 in IFNγ-Mediated PD-L1 Expression and Bladder Cancer Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition
Hanwei Zhang,et al.Cancer Res Commun. 2024.PMCID: PMC11345674
“Antagonism of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis is a critical therapeutic strategy for patients with advanced bladder cancer. IFNγ functions as a key regulator of PD-L1 in both immune as well as cancer cells. Forkhead box P3 (FOXP3) is a transcription factor synonymous in T regulatory cell function but with increasingly described functions in cancer cells. Here, we investigated the relationship between FOXP3 and PD-L1 in bladder cancer. We showed that FOXP3 is critical in the ability for IFNγ to activate PD-L1 in bladder cancer cells. FOXP3 can bind to the PD-L1 promoter and induces a gene program that leads to regulation of multiple immune-related genes and genes involved in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Using in vitro and in vivo human and murine models, we showed that FOXP3 can influence bladder cancer EMT as well as promote cancer metastases. Furthermore, FOXP3 may be a convergent factor for multiple activators of PD-L1, including the chemotherapeutic drug cisplatin.”

17、Aurora A kinase inhibition induces accumulation of SCLC tumor cells in mitosis with restored interferon signaling to increase response to PD-L1
Yixiang Li,et al.Cell Rep Med. 2023.PMCID: PMC10694667
“Despite small cell lung cancers (SCLCs) having a high mutational burden, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunotherapy only modestly increases survival. A subset of SCLCs that lose their ASCL1 neuroendocrine phenotype and restore innate immune signaling (termed the “inflammatory” subtype) have durable responses to PD-L1. Some SCLCs are highly sensitive to Aurora kinase inhibitors, but early-phase trials show short-lived responses, suggesting effective therapeutic combinations are needed to increase their durability. Using immunocompetent SCLC genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) and syngeneic xenografts, we show durable efficacy with the combination of a highly specific Aurora A kinase inhibitor (LSN3321213) and PD-L1. LSN3321213 causes accumulation of tumor cells in mitosis with lower ASCL1 expression and higher expression of interferon target genes and antigen-presentation genes mimicking the inflammatory subtype in a cell-cycle-dependent manner. These data demonstrate that inflammatory gene expression is restored in mitosis in SCLC, which can be exploited by Aurora A kinase inhibition.”

18、Activity of murine surrogate antibodies for durvalumab and tremelimumab lacking effector function and the ability to deplete regulatory T cells in mouse models of cancer
Darren J Schofield,et al.MAbs. 2021.PMCID: PMC7831362
“Preclinical studies of PD-L1 and CTLA-4 blockade have relied heavily on mouse syngeneic tumor models with intact immune systems, which facilitate dissection of immunosuppressive mechanisms in the tumor microenvironment. Commercially developed monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting human PD-L1, PD-1, and CTLA-4 may not demonstrate cross-reactive binding to their mouse orthologs, and surrogate anti-mouse antibodies are often used in their place to inhibit these immune checkpoints. In each case, multiple choices exist for surrogate antibodies, which differ with respect to species of origin, affinity, and effector function. To develop relevant murine surrogate antibodies for the anti-human PD-L1 mAb durvalumab and the anti-human CTLA-4 mAb tremelimumab, rat/mouse chimeric or fully murine mAbs engineered for reduced effector function were developed and compared with durvalumab and tremelimumab. Characterization included determination of target affinity, in vivo effector function, pharmacokinetic profile, and anti-tumor efficacy in mouse syngeneic tumor models. Results showed that anti–PD-L1 and anti–CTLA-4 murine surrogates with pharmacologic properties similar to those of durvalumab and tremelimumab demonstrated anti-tumor activity in a subset of commonly used mouse syngeneic tumor models. This activity was not entirely dependent on antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis effector function, or regulatory T-cell depletion, as antibodies engineered to lack these features showed activity in models historically sensitive to checkpoint inhibition, albeit at a significantly lower level than antibodies with intact effector function.”

19、Lymph node and tumor-associated PD-L1+ macrophages antagonize dendritic cell vaccines by suppressing CD8+ T cells
Jenny Sprooten,et al.Cell Rep Med. 2024.PMCID: PMC10829875
“Current immunotherapies provide limited benefits against T cell-depleted tumors, calling for therapeutic innovation. Using multi-omics integration of cancer patient data, we predict a type I interferon (IFN) responseHIGH state of dendritic cell (DC) vaccines, with efficacious clinical impact. However, preclinical DC vaccines recapitulating this state by combining immunogenic cancer cell death with induction of type I IFN responses fail to regress mouse tumors lacking T cell infiltrates. Here, in lymph nodes (LNs), instead of activating CD4+/CD8+ T cells, DCs stimulate immunosuppressive programmed death-ligand 1-positive (PD-L1+) LN-associated macrophages (LAMs). Moreover, DC vaccines also stimulate PD-L1+ tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). This creates two anatomically distinct niches of PD-L1+ macrophages that suppress CD8+ T cells. Accordingly, a combination of PD-L1 blockade with DC vaccines achieves significant tumor regression by depleting PD-L1+ macrophages, suppressing myeloid inflammation, and de-inhibiting effector/stem-like memory T cells. Importantly, clinical DC vaccines also potentiate T cell-suppressive PD-L1+ TAMs in glioblastoma patients. We propose that a multimodal immunotherapy and vaccination regimen is mandatory to overcome T cell-depleted tumors.”

20、A newly discovered PD-L1 B-cell epitope peptide vaccine (PDL1-Vaxx) exhibits potent immune responses and effective anti-tumor immunity in multiple syngeneic mice models and (synergizes) in combination with a dual HER-2 B-cell vaccine (B-Vaxx)
Linlin Guo,et al.Oncoimmunology. 2022.PMCID: PMC9542669
“Blockade of checkpoint receptors with monoclonal antibodies against CTLA-4, PD-1 and PD-L1 has shown great clinical success in several cancer subtypes, yielding unprecedented responses albeit a significant number of patients develop resistance and remain refractory. Both PD-1/PD-L1 and HER-2 signaling pathway inhibitors have limited efficacy and exhibits significant toxicities that limit their use. Ongoing clinical studies support the need for rationale combination of immuno-oncology agents to make a significant impact in the lives of cancer patients. We introduce the development of a novel chimeric PD-L1 B-cell peptide epitope vaccine (amino acid 130–147) linked to a “promiscuous” T cell measles virus fusion (MVF) peptide (MVF-PD-L1(130); PDL1-Vaxx) or linked to tetanus toxoid (TT3) TT3-PD-L1 (130) via a linker (GPSL). These vaccine constructs are highly immunogenic and antigenic in several syngeneic animal models. The PD-L1 vaccines elicited high titers of polyclonal antibodies that inhibit tumor growth in multiple syngeneic cancer models, eliciting antibodies of different subtypes IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b and IgG3, induced PD-1/PD-L1 blockade, decreased proliferation, induced apoptosis and caused ADCC of tumor cells. The PDL1-Vaxx induces similar inhibition of tumor growth versus the standard anti-mouse PD-L1 antibody in both syngeneic BALB/c and C57BL/6J mouse models. The combination of PDL1-Vaxx with HER-2 vaccine B-Vaxx demonstrated synergistic tumor inhibition in D2F2/E2 carcinoma cell line. The anti-PDL1-Vaxx block PD-1/PD-L1 interaction and significantly prolonged anti-tumor responses in multiple syngeneic tumor models. The combination of HER-2 vaccine (B-Vaxx) with either PDL1-Vaxx or PD1-Vaxx demonstrated synergistic tumor inhibition. PDL1-Vaxx is a promising novel safe checkpoint inhibitor vaccine.”

Related Recombinant IgG Reference Antibodies:
Recombinant Mouse IgG1 Isotype Control Antibody and Mutants, In vivo Grade
Recombinant Mouse IgG2a Isotype Control Antibody and Mutants, In vivo Grade
Recombinant Mouse IgG2c Isotype Control Antibody and Mutants, In vivo Grade
Recombinant Rat IgG2a Isotype Control Antibody, In vivo Grade

Syd Labs provides the following anti-mouse PD-L1 / PD-1 antibodies:
Recombinant anti-mouse PD1 antibodies (Clone 29F.1A12.1), In vivo grade
Recombinant anti-mouse PD-1 antibodies (Clone RMP1-14.1), In vivo grade
Recombinant anti-mouse PD-L1 antibodies (Clone 10F.9G2.1), In vivo grade
Recombinant anti-mouse PD-1 / PD-1 bispecific antibodies (Clone RMP1-14.1 / 29F.1A12.1), In vivo grade
Recombinant anti-mouse PD-1 / PD-1 bispecific antibodies (Clone 29F.1A12.1 / RMP1-14.1), In vivo grade
Recombinant anti-mouse PD-1 / PD-L1 bispecific antibodies (Clone RMP1-14.1 / 10F.9G2.1), In vivo grade
Recombinant anti-mouse PD-L1 / PD-1 bispecific antibodies (Clone 10F.9G2.1 / RMP1-14.1), In vivo grade
Recombinant anti-mouse PD-1 / PD-L1 bispecific antibodies (Clone 29F.1A12.1 / 10F.9G2.1), In vivo grade
Recombinant anti-mouse PD-L1 / PD-1 bispecific antibodies (Clone 10F.9G2.1 / 29F.1A12.1), In vivo grade

Questions and Answers about anti-mouse PD-L1 antibody (Clone 10F.9G2):

Question: Do you produce Fc-silenced 10F.9G2 antibody?
Answer: Sure, we provide various recombinant Fc slient 10F.9G2 antibodies, such as mIgG2c LALAPG, mIgG2a LALAPG, and mIgG1 D265A. We also provide custom recombinant antibody production service to produce other engineered versions of recombinant 10F.9G2 antibodies.

Question: What is the difference among PA007164.r2b and PA007164.m2cLA?
Answer: PA007164.r2a is the recombinant anti-mouse PD L1 monoclonal antibody (rat IgG2b kappa, clone 10F.9G2.1) produced in CHO cells or HEK293 cells if needed. It has the same variable region and constant region sequences as the rat anti-mouse PD-L1 monoclonal antibody from the hybridoma clone of 10F.9G2. Rat antibodies may cause high immuogenicity in mice; thus, at least recombinant antibodies with mouse antibody constant regions should be used to replace the rat antibody constant regions. PA007164.m2cLA is the recombinant anti-mouse PD-L1 antibody (clone 10F.9G2.1) whose constant regions are mouse IgG2c LALAPG kappa.

Anti-mouse PD-L1 antibody (10F.9G2.1) from: Recombinant Anti-Myc-Tag Mouse IgG1 Monoclonal Antibody (clone 9E10): PA007164.r2b Syd Labs

No more offers for this product!